Ministry of foreign affairs in december the first regular press conference, foreign ministry spokesman for london commented that “has just ended in nanjing, china-eu summit, china and the eu in the rmb exchange rate and a series of key issues, and does not eliminate the differences , thus think that the talks did not achieve significant breakthrough “refuted: eu leaders on climate change, the rmb exchange rate, central europe to join hands to deal with international financial crises and promote full recovery of the world economy and sustainable development issues such as in-depth exchange of views, the two sides reached important consensus, the consensus reflected in the joint statement has been released

Ministry of Foreign Affairs in December the first regular press conference, Foreign Ministry Spokesman For LONDON commented that “has just ended in Nanjing, China-EU summit, China and the EU in the RMB exchange rate and a series of key issues, and does not eliminate the differences , thus think that the talks did not achieve significant breakthrough “refuted: EU leaders on climate change, the RMB exchange rate, Central Europe to join hands to deal with international financial crises and promote full recovery of the world economy and sustainable development issues such as in-depth exchange of views, the two sides reached important consensus, the consensus reflected in the joint statement has been released.
I thought that some of the comments outside the European Union, the RMB exchange rate to measure the pressure on China-EU summit results and progress in China-EU relations prejudice standard is an ulterior motive, because, according to their actual situation and the principle of steady progress in the internationalization of the RMB exchange rate reform and the problem is that China’s consistent position, this should be economic development, “ripe,” the product rather than a “Destructive Enthusiasm,” the product of the last century, Japan is because the Western countries put pressure on the exchange rate policy has been misleading due to economic hardship still before us. To jointly oppose trade protectionism, is the greatest achievement of the China-EU summit, the EU if it can effectively fulfill promises to curb the rise of its internal protectionism, the international trade order, the maintenance of positive significance. The current intra-EU trade protectionism, the noise has shown a wave after wave of momentum, based on relevant statistics, the EU has become a “global trade protectionism, the gathering of the most intensive” one: As of the end of September 2009, the European Union implemented a total of of the 132 formal anti-dumping measures and countervailing measures, 8, and a further 54 trade protection investigations are continuing.
As everyone knows, China’s footwear, steel products such as the current EU trade protectionism around the world have become the biggest “victims,” the EU trade protectionism, one often fought under the banner is the “trade imbalance”, and the products and industries between China and Europe export structures are often shown that the low-end and high-end staggered phenomenon, and that China’s exports a significant part of foreign enterprises in China, including many European Union countries invested enterprises in China, export, global division of labor in different phenomenon should not be a result of trade has been reading too much into human emotion.
The EU protectionism around the world such as “conspicuous” one of the causes lies in its internal inter-state economic development does not balance, this is the complexity of the economic and trade relations between China and EU-US trade and economic relations far beyond the reason why. Given China’s footwear exports to the EU, for example, the majority of countries within the EU because it has long been out of their own domestic shoe manufacturing industry, so cheap and good Chinese shoes will not only benefit consumers in those countries, but also conducive to vendors in those countries , but there is still some domestic footwear industry of the EU countries, competitive Chinese products will no doubt not in conformity with their domestic laws of the market economy to a certain impact on the industry. Therefore, all countries from the European Union’s overall and long-term interests of the point of view, these moves against Chinese products, but the behavior is the only ?????, after all, be in accordance with international experience, the consequences of trade protection, they will be tit for tat “retaliation” only.
Between China and the EU are each other’s first, the second largest trading partner, interests in common far outweigh their differences, the face of China’s rise and friendly tolerance, within the EU should move from the current number of “myopic” behavior based on long-term, win-win situation is the realization of two of the most pragmatic choice.

  • Добавить ВКонтакте заметку об этой странице
  • Мой Мир
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LiveJournal
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • В закладки Google
  • Google Buzz
  • Яндекс.Закладки
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • БобрДобр
  • MisterWong.RU
  • Memori.ru
  • МоёМесто.ru
  • Сто закладок

Comments are closed.

Реклама
Recent Posts